Richard A. Dengel

continued tweaking the system. There have been few radical changes, mostly clarifications and quiet adjustments. The biggest change came about because of Bill Byrne's AAR, and then but to clarify artillery capabilities. The re-formatted Rebel Yell system provided a sound foundation on which to build. So overall the work has been 10 years in the making with countless playings along the way. No that much in the way of rule changes, though. What sort of research regimen do you use? rad: First I look to general tactical overviews. Paddy Griffith's Battle Tactics of the Civil War and his shorter Battle in the Civil War are my bibles, followed closely by Jack Coggins Arms and Equipment of the Civil War. The Bloody Crucible of Courage by Brent Nosworthy and McWhinney & Jamieson's Attack and Die also provide some spice. After these I take one or two reputable narratives specific to a battle and build on them. For example, Old Burn at Newbern extrapolates largely on an article I found in Blue and Gray magazine. For Iuka I used Peter Cozzens' account in The Darkest Days of the War. I won't recite the entire bibliography, but you get the idea. Essentially I take generic principles and apply them to the specific instances of a battle. Of course, I adjust as necessary to account for unit morale, leadership, and weaponry (at least as I interpret them). For added flavor I research period battle flags and leader images to decorate the pieces. What was your design purpose (aside from lighter version of RY)? rad: Rebel Yell, once learned, is a challenging and unpredictable game. It is subject to wild fluctuations of fortune. I've seen games where my opponent is on the brink of collapse only to rebound with a ferocious counter attack in his turn. One should never concede based on an opponents second Action segment. Remember, you'll reply with two of your own and that can spell the difference between a loss and a slogging on. Unfortunately, because of its length and complexity, I always wondered how accessible Rebel Yell was. Its easy to be put off by the length of the rules. My purpose in Huzzah is to present a gateway game that presents the principles of the parent in a more digestible, manageable format. Huzzah is a relatively quick moving game that contains all of the stress and problem-solving contained in the original. I wanted a "simple" game, fraught with challenge, and true to the principles of ACW tactical combat. In Huzzah you must exhaust and depress your opponent. It not likely you'll achieve a numerical victory but it is certainly possible to wring a mental one. That, I think, is the epitome of ACW combat.